He Has Called the Dollar Dead for Decades. The Curve Is Finally Loud

September 12, 2026, Author - Ben McGregor

Peter Schiff sat with David Lin and said there is no stopping this train. Higher Japanese rates. A weaker dollar. A bond market that can gap. Gold from $5,600 toward $4,300 is, in his book, a sale. The missing sentence is the one he has always resisted: every fiat can decay, and the dollar can still be the least ugly house on the street.

 

Schiff has made that dollar call since the 2000s. Gold did the work he advertised. It left the $300s and printed four figures, then five. The dollar did not vanish. It remains the invoice currency, the reserve, and the thing foreign ministries still hold when they dump a friend. That tension is the story. Not a victory lap. Not a eulogy.

The tape behind the interview is not abstract. The 10-year is near 5%. Traders price an 88% chance of a hike next week. Year-over-year CPI printed 3.4% on September 11, in line with the headline guess, with a firmer core tenth. Oil sits near $100 on both markers. Bessent’s Treasury buybacks went from $2 billion toward $6 billion and yields still rose. Schiff’s September 8 title was the bond market is about to break. Lin asked him to defend it.

The Yen Works Until It Works Too Well

In July, Schiff wrote that Kevin Warsh had chosen inflation over the yen. Intervention bought a bounce. The yen left the worst prints and later traded near 153 in Lin’s telling. Schiff’s verdict: it worked a little. It does not work for long.

What strengthens the yen, he said, is higher Japanese rates and a weaker dollar. If the yen stops falling, it can rise. That unwind is the other wreck. Carry trades built on cheap yen and a firm dollar do not like either repair. Damned if Tokyo caps the slide. Damned if it cannot.

Friedland said the same week that copper in yen already looks unobtainable. That is Schiff’s dollar-weight argument in another metal. A collapsing measuring stick lifts the nominal quote. A rising yen slams the carry book. Markets can get both headaches in sequence.

Buybacks Advertise the Problem

Lin played Bessent: Bloomberg terminal bros can be unhappy; America has the best-performing bond market; yields now track energy; this is a supply shock we will get through. Schiff granted the oil-yield correlation. He denied the alibi.

Inflation, he said, is lifting both crude and the long end. Calling it only a war premium lets policy off the hook. “Best performing bond market in the world” is, in his view, false. Relative to U.S. history, the last decade of bond returns is among the worst in a century. Other sovereigns are selling too, because other governments made the same mistake. Switzerland can be the exception. It is not the rule.

The August 19 buyback doubling was, to Schiff, a flare. Announce that you must support the long end and holders hear a warning. Sell first. The size is still small. Treasury funds long-bond purchases by issuing bills. That rearranges the curve. It does not retire duration. The deep pocket is the Fed, which can print. That pocket is more inflationary. He thinks that is where the path leads.

He would not buy long Treasuries. He would not buy TIPS. He does not trust the CPI link. Gold from under $300 to over $4,000 is his scoreboard against inflation paper. Attribute that scoreboard to him. It is not a guarantee of the next print.

A Supply Shock Still Needs a Smaller Money Stock

Lin asked the fair question. If gasoline and oil did the CPI damage, why hike into a war? Schiff’s answer is 1970s muscle memory and the early COVID excuse. Oil, he said, is not only Hormuz. It is also fiscal and monetary excess. The war may last. Sanctions will not end it on his clock. If goods shrink and money does not, prices rise. The original Fed was sold as elastic money: contract when supply contracts. It does not.

His sharper point is older than this war. Inflation is not only prices going up. It is prices failing to fall when they should have. After 2008, a lot of the new money stayed in stocks, bonds, and homes. The lag into the checkout aisle was longer than he expected. The CPI, redesigned in the 1990s, is a speedometer that reads 20 at 60. Look out the window.

Higher long rates, he argued, do not fix this by starving demand cleanly. Interest is a cost. Firms pass it on. Credit has kept expanding through prior hikes, which told him the hikes were too small. Fiscal policy stayed loose. Quarter-point steps plus a growing balance sheet is not a vice.

Forty Years Up. Six Years Down. Maybe Ten Back.

The bond bull ran from 1980 to 2020. Ten-year yields fell from the mid-teens toward 60 basis points. Schiff called the low the blow-off. The bear, he says, is six years old. Bears usually run faster than bulls. A 40-year drop in yields might reverse in a decade. The bottom can fall out. Then the Fed panics and prints, which is more fuel.

The 60/40 habit assumed stocks and yields moved opposite. They have been moving together. Lin asked why stocks must break. Schiff’s reply: a move from 2% to 4% can be shrugged off when real rates are still negative. A move from 5% to 6% or 7% is a different discount rate. Debt rolls. Consumers roll. A house-price break hits banks. 1987 is his scare chart — yields up, dollar down, deficits wide, equities numb, then not numb.

That analogy is a warning, not a date. 1987 cleared in months. Today’s debt load is larger. AI capex is holding GDP prints that look strong. JPMorgan’s proxy, in Lin’s clip, was about 0.4 points of a 2.1% growth pace — a fifth of the gain. Schiff called the financing incestuous: vendors lending to customers who own the vendors’ stock, used chips that do not get cheaper, hyperscalers selling bills to fund the build and then competing with Treasury for cash. When old buyers of duration become sellers — Japan, other official accounts, Social Security’s trust fund in his list — he asks who is left besides the Fed.

The Political Layer Is Not a Price

Schiff’s midterm talk is partisan and should be read as such. He says public gloom and cost-of-living polls already show the squeeze. He says a Democratic Congress would spend more, and that a weakened White House would sign. He calls tariff revenue an American tax, not a foreign tribute, and cites a FedEx bill on a European part. He says the merchandise deficit had a record year in 2025 and that China sold more to the rest of the world. Those trade claims need the official tables next to them. The mechanism is familiar: tax the import, the buyer pays, volumes shift, the bilateral gap with one country can shrink while the global gap does not.

High oil helps U.S. producers. He owns some. He still calls it a net loss for a nation that burns more than it celebrates. Empty ships still burn bunker on the way back.

His Book, and the House on the Block

Near the close he did not rotate out of gold. He called $4,000 support after a run to $5,600 and a dip toward $4,300. Silver near $64 was, to him, half a prior spike and a better entry. Miners still look cheap in that frame. He wants more rate pressure into the midterms, more official attempts to cap the long end, and more inflation from those attempts.

That is one map. Harry Dent’s map still wants a deflation crash and gold at the old floor. UBS still warns a hike can knock the metal first. Official buyers still take tonnes. All three can be true in different months. Schiff has been early for a generation and right on the direction of the ounce. He has been early on the dollar’s funeral. Funerals in reserve currencies take longer than newsletters.

Paper currencies can go to zero. History is littered with them. The dollar can lose purchasing power for decades and remain the currency people reach for when the alternative is the yen, the euro, or a wartime invoice. Best house, bad neighborhood. That is not comfort. It is ranking. Gold and a short list of real assets are how some people under-write the ranking without pretending the neighborhood is fine.

Resource investors already live on that street. Oil is a cost and a bid. Copper is a deficit and a tariff coin flip. Gold is the ballast Schiff will not sell. Size still matters. A $5,600 dream is not a plan if the 10-year rips to 6% before the Fed blinks.

Conclusion

Schiff’s train is fiscal denial, cosmetic buybacks, a hike that is too small, and a long end that does not care about the press conference. Lin’s questions were the right ones: yen, oil, CPI, 60/40, midterms, the dip. The honest overlay is older than both men. Fiat decays. Hierarchy remains. Get off the duration car if you believe him. Do not confuse that with the dollar already being scrap.

Watch the 10-year, the hike, and whether Treasury buybacks grow into Fed purchases. Watch diesel, not the speech. Watch gold’s $4,000 handle as a line, not a religion. The wreck, if it comes, will not send a calendar invite.

Important information

This article is commentary on a David Lin interview with Peter Schiff. Political characterizations and forecasts are the speaker’s. Shift Gold, T-Gold, and Euro Pacific Asset Management were mentioned by Schiff as his businesses; they are not recommendations. Past gold performance is not a guarantee. This is not advice to buy or sell any currency, bond, metal, or security. Speak with a licensed adviser. The author and publisher accept no liability for actions taken on this article.

Ben McGregor

Author

Ben McGregor authors the Weekly Roundup at CanadianMiningReport.com, providing sharp analysis of the metals and mining sector. With a talent for spotting trends, Ben distills complex market shifts into clear, engaging insights on TSXV junior miners. His weekly updates cover gold, copper, uranium, and more, blending data-driven perspectives with a knack for identifying opportunities. A vital resource for investors, Ben’s work navigates the dynamic junior mining landscape with precision.

Share to Youtube Share to Facebook Facebook Share to Linkedin Share to Twitter Twitter Share to Tiktok