The Trade Fight Has a New Audience. It Is Not Ottawa's.

September 12, 2026, Author - Ben McGregor

Victor Davis Hansen's warning to Mark Carney is simple. Do not get on the wrong side of the American public. Cheap booing travels. A $50 billion goods surplus does not buy a navy.

 

Hansen, speaking for The Daily Signal, has been staging the Canada–U.S. fight in chapters. Stage one was shock: two English-speaking neighbours, same civilizational root, longest undefended border, suddenly furious. Stage two was the Carney narrative. Washington as bully. Sovereignty as the prize. Stage three was the second look: why walk out of a deal late on a Friday, stay murky on the terms, and talk as if dumped Chinese steel, aluminum, and EVs assembled for the U.S. market were a hill to die on. Stage four, he says, is when Americans start to watch the tape.

That tape, in his telling, is sports-crowd booing, “elbows up” talk, and a prime minister who treats midterm America as a theatre. Gavin Newsom cutting Canada-friendly video. Tariffs aimed at red and purple border states. Governors and senators taking Ottawa’s side against their own president. Hansen’s point is not manners. It is leverage. A country of about 41 million, in his numbers nine times smaller in population and thirteen times smaller in nominal GDP, is 75% tied to one customer. The U.S. printed 160,000 jobs in August, he said. Canada lost 41,000 in a week of the tariff war. Attribute those prints to him. Check them before you bet a plant on them. The direction is what he wants you to see. The smaller economy feels the hit first.

This page does not need Hansen’s adjectives to make the resource case. Canada sat on metals, potash, timber, oil, and gas and then wondered why the books needed a U.S. surplus. Alberta can sell barrels into Washington and the Midwest. It still cannot build a pipe to its own coast on a political timetable. If Quebec and Ontario want Alberta molecules, they often ride the American system. That is not a Trump invention. It is a decade of federal and provincial choices. Net-zero theatre and a permitting clock that turns a discovery into a twenty-year option are Canadian products. Hansen is not wrong that Washington did not design the interprovincial mess.

What Carney Is Selling, and What He Is Not Building

Hansen’s charge on China is the one Ottawa hates to hear out loud. Why side, even tactically, with a state that dumps below cost, runs mercantilist surpluses, plays the currency, and ignores patents — a state he called a direct descendant of a system that killed tens of millions — over the neighbour that still underwrites NORAD? The steel and aluminum file, as he frames it, is transshipment. Cheap Chinese metal into Canadian shops, then into U.S. vehicle bays, around an American tariff wall. The EV file is the same shape. The digital-services tax, a 5% levy on top of corporate tax that Canada applies to U.S. platforms and does not face in reverse, is the cultural cousin. We do not tax the Globe to fund a San Joaquin Valley beat. He is right that the symmetry is ugly.

He is also right that mystery is a strategy until it is a liability. Walking out at the eleventh hour and refusing a clean account of the clause that broke the table leaves a vacuum. Vacuums fill with “bully” talk. They also fill with questions about Alberta and Quebec ballots Carney would rather not face as stand-alone countries. Hansen thinks the anti-American heat is partly domestic glue. That is an American historian’s read. Canadian readers can test it against their own premiers.

Carney’s globalist résumé is not a smear. It is the record voters hired. Three passports in Hansen’s telling. Bank of England. Davos fluency. Energy, defence, immigration, and trade all written in a European hand. The bet was that a calcified social-welfare state could still skim a goods surplus off a U.S. “free trade” zone that was never free in the mercantilist sense. Hansen’s surplus figure is $50 billion to $60 billion a year northbound. Methodologies differ. Energy distorts the total. The political fact does not. Washington is done calling a structural deficit gratitude.

Defence Is the Quiet Invoice

The Arctic line is the one mining people should not skip. Warming opens talk of a working Northwest Passage. Russia and China already rehearse the theatre. Hansen’s order of battle for Canada: about 79 fighters, many of them 45 years old; perhaps 30 to 35 ships of real size; a promise on NATO spending that was welched for years. California’s National Guard, he joked, is in the same jet neighbourhood. Hyperbole aside, the RCAF and RCN are not built for an unsupervised Arctic. Missile warning and air defence still sit on a U.S. spine. Europe learned what “subsidized defence” meant when the invoice arrived. Canada is next in that speech.

A million Canadians in the United States versus a quarter million Americans in Canada is Hansen’s migration irony. His personal irony is sharper and less checked: Carney children at Harvard and Yale, capital parked in America, small Canadian shops told to tough out a war the prime minister would not fund with his own book. Treat the family detail as Hansen’s claim. Treat the capital-allocation point as the one that matters. People with choices do not put the whole stack in a jurisdiction they are busy insulting.

Stage Four Cuts Both Ways

Hansen’s closing caution is the operational one. Reciprocal tariffs began as a tool to shrink a surplus to a manageable number. Gin up a moral war, mix it with Beijing, put it on American television every night, and the tariffs stop being surgical. “Your economy cannot withstand it. Not what you and Justin Trudeau did to it.” That is his sentence. This page’s version is colder. You cannot run a high-cost, slow-permit resource country, keep defence on the American tab, lecture the customer, and assume the customer’s voters will stay bored.

Europe, he said, enjoys the show. Not one capital copied the counter-tariff. Only China stood with Ottawa on that gesture. A neck that far out is a neck. Forty-one million people are attached to it.

Canadian Mining Report readers do not need a lecture on elbows. They need a map. Tariffs are trade taxes. They raise input costs on both sides of the border. They hit B.C. hardest in some of the latest 50% rounds. They hit Quebec jobs. They hit mine capex when diesel and steel move. They also hit the fantasy that official Ottawa can lock the ground, tax the platforms, skip the pipes, and still collect a U.S. bid forever.

If Carney ever tables a real project list — permits that close, pipes that cross a provincial line, a fighter fleet that is not a museum — this page will print it. A YouTube scold is not that list. Neither is a hockey slogan.

Conclusion

Hansen’s four stages are a story about attention. First surprise. Then blame. Then the second look at why the deal died and why China was the prop. Now the American living room. Booing plays in that room. So does a 79-jet air force and a surplus that was sold as friendship.

Canada’s treasure was never the talking point. It was the rock, the barrel, and the tree. Leaving them in the ground and picking a fight with the only buyer large enough to matter is not sovereignty. It is a margin call. Do not get on the wrong side of the people who still write the insurance policy. That is Hansen’s closer. It is also arithmetic.

Important information

This article is commentary on a Daily Signal monologue by Victor Davis Hansen. Job counts, surplus figures, force numbers, family details, and investment claims are his unless independently noted. They may be incomplete or wrong. This is not advice on trade policy, securities, or political donations. Speak with a licensed adviser before acting on markets. The author and publisher accept no liability for actions taken on this article.

Ben McGregor

Author

Ben McGregor authors the Weekly Roundup at CanadianMiningReport.com, providing sharp analysis of the metals and mining sector. With a talent for spotting trends, Ben distills complex market shifts into clear, engaging insights on TSXV junior miners. His weekly updates cover gold, copper, uranium, and more, blending data-driven perspectives with a knack for identifying opportunities. A vital resource for investors, Ben’s work navigates the dynamic junior mining landscape with precision.

Share to Youtube Share to Facebook Facebook Share to Linkedin Share to Twitter Twitter Share to Tiktok